Legal Opinion

Clement v. Nacol

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1976No. 17753PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BREWSTER, Justice. '

The plaintiff, Adam S. Nacol, sued defendant, Howard Clement, in trespass to try title. The case started as a jury trial, but at the close of all the evidence the trial court dismissed the jury and rendered judgment, stating that the court was of the opinion that plaintiff, Nacol, should recover from the defendant, Clement, the title and possession of the premises described (the land was here described in the trial court’s judgment by metes and bounds).

The judgment also stated the following:

“The Court further finds that the Plaintiff has the right, after having put…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Service Mut. Ins. Co. of Texas v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Wheat v. Citizens National Bank at BrownwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Pettit v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Aquarius Condominium Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Arrechea v. ArrecheaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API