Service Mut. Ins. Co. of Texas v. White
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case, and has been advanced for submission here under rule of our court. Appellee was in jured while' working on forms in which concrete was to be poured; he was a bridge carpenter.. On findings of the jury, judgment for total and permanent incapacity was rendered in favor of appellee and a lump sum compensation awarded- him.
Reversal is sought because of admission of certain evidence; because of the court’s refusal to give a peremptory instruction in appellant’s favor; because the court, defined the term “preponderance of the evidence” ; because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Employers' Ins. Co. v. SingletonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- American Surety Co. of New York v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Safety Casualty Co. v. TeetsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PorterfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.