Legal Opinion

J Hamblen Et Ux v. Hon. hatch/winslow Memorial

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2017No. CV-16-0260-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 In this employment dispute, the parties submitted them respective claims to mandatory arbitration under their employment contract’s broad arbitration provision, which neither side challenged. The arbitrator ruled in favor of the employer, concluding that it properly rescinded the contract based on the employee’s underlying misrepresentations and omissions. The final arbitration award, which the superior court later confirmed at the employer’s request, fully settled all claims and counterclaims submitted to arbitration and denied all claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. COHAN v. ACME LIFT COMPANY, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  2. Chayce v. Path ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  3. Duncan v. Public StorageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
  4. Fisher v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Gilbert v. Hon. foster/hon. hudson/beattyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API