Legal Opinion

Candido v. Wagonfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint is by a pharmacist retailer against defendants, likewise engaged in retail as well as wholesale business, under sections 369-a and 369-b of the General Business Law. It seeks to enforce the fair-trade contract of the manufacturers listed in the complaint.

It would seem desirable to hold decision within narrow compass, to avoid judicial involvement in an underlying basic issue essentially economic, with overtones of a nature political in a broad sense. For there is a fundamental clash of interests between the producer and distributor of merchandise on the one hand, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weisinger v. RaeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Automotive Electric Service Corp. v. Times Square Stores Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fogel v. BoletNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Pordes v. LytheNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Anderson v. Sonbac Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Librandi v. Berner's Pharmacy Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API