Legal Opinion

Fogel v. Bolet

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Isidor Wasservogel,

Official Referee. This is an action brought by plaintiff pursuant to the Feld-Orawford Law *1018(L. 1935, ch. 976), wherein he seeks an injunction permanently restraining and enjoining defendant from continuing the alleged breach of the terms of certain “ fair trade contracts ” and schedules of prices annexed to them.

Plaintiff and defendant are engaged in the business of selling at retail cameras and photographic products. In terms of distance, defendant is plaintiff’s closest competitor; their stores are located approximately two blocks apart, at No. 68 Cortlandt Street and at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Edward Thompson Co. v. American Law Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  4. Port Chester Wine & Liquor Shop, Inc. v. Miller Bros. Fruiterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Fay v. LambourneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Weisinger v. RaeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pordes v. LytheNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Candido v. WagonfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Family Bargain Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API