George F. Jones & Co. v. Brown
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 20, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1898, No. 705, making absolute a rule to dissolve an attachment under the act of 1869. Attachment under the act of 1869 to recover the price of goods sold and delivered. Plaintiff in his statement of claim averred that the sum of $1,278.64 was due for goods sold and delivered.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 20, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1898, No. 705, making absolute a rule to dissolve an attachment under the act of 1869. Attachment under the act of 1869 to recover the price of goods sold and delivered. Plaintiff in his statement of claim averred that the sum of $1,278.64 was due for goods sold and delivered. He further averred “ that by false and fraudulent representations as to his financial condition, the defendant induced him, the said plaintiff, to extend the time for the payment of said account, and to accept in settlement…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find nothing in this record that would justify a reversal of the order dissolving the attachment. Neither of the assignments of error requires special notice. They are all dismissed.
Judgment affirmed without prejudice, etc.