Legal Opinion

Getz v. Harley

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided July 21, 1949No. 372Published

1Opinion of the Court

Corson, J.,

Upon motion of defendants, John B. Harley and Emma C. Harley, his wife, a rule 'has been granted upon plaintiffs, Stanley M. Getz and T. H. Getz, trading as Stanley M. Getz & Company, to show cause why an attachment issued on January 25, 1949, under the Fraudulent Debtor’s Attachment Act of March 17,1869, P. L. 8, 12 PS §2711 et seq., should not be dissolved.

On March 25, 1948, John B. Harley signed a card appointing plaintiff, Stanley M. Getz & Company, the sole and exclusive agent for the sale of the Harley residence at 7918 Heather Road, Elkins Park, Pa. Realtor Getz advertised…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Werner v. ZierfussSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Covanhovan v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  3. Biddle v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Walls v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Locey v. Sterling Motor Truck Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API