Legal Opinion
Espresso Roma Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 2002No. A095229PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, Acting P. J.
Espresso Roma Corporation, Pacific Espresso Corporation, and David S. Boyd doing business as Hillside Residence Hall (appellants) appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint alleging several causes of action against Bank of America, N.A. (Bank), based upon its payment of forged checks drawn on appellants’ accounts by one of their former employees. The court entered judgment in favor of the Bank after it granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that appellants were precluded by California Uniform Commercial Code 1 section 4406, subdivisions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Roy Supply, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Mac v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Story Road Flea Market, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. And Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Spacemakers of America, Inc. v. Suntrust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Severin Mobile Towing, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase etc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Travelers Casualty v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- dotStrategy Co. v. Facebook IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020