Legal Opinion

Phifer v. Officer Moneymaker

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 29, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00149Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RACHEL MARIA PHIFER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No.: 3:19-CV-149-CLC-HBG v. ) ) OFFICER MONEYMAKER, ) ) Defendant. ) M E M O R A N D U M This is a pro se prisoner’s complaint for violation of civil rights filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, this action will be DISMISSED as time-barred, barred due to res judicata, and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 5) will be DENIED AS MOOT. I. SCREENING…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API