Phifer v. Officer Moneymaker
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RACHEL MARIA PHIFER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No.: 3:19-CV-149-CLC-HBG v. ) ) OFFICER MONEYMAKER, ) ) Defendant. ) M E M O R A N D U M This is a pro se prisoner’s complaint for violation of civil rights filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, this action will be DISMISSED as time-barred, barred due to res judicata, and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 5) will be DENIED AS MOOT. I. SCREENING…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.