Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Hughes

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Aureal by the landlord from a final order in summary proceedings, rendered in favor of the tenant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eighth district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

This is an appeal from a final order, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the tenant, in summary proceedings instituted by the landlord. After the jury had *249returned its verdict in favor of the tenant, the counsel for the landlord moved to set aside the verdict upon the grounds stated in section 254 of the Municipal Court Act. In response to this motion the justice said: “Make your motion on notice.” The record before us does not show that such a motion was subsequently made and determined by the justice. It does show that a final order was entered in favor of the tenant. The notice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coe v. . HobbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Smith v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Howard v. DoolittleThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
  4. People Ex Rel. Livermore v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Dorschel v. BurklyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. BauderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Gordon v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Adams Recreation Palace, Inc. v. GriffithOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Glassheim v. MillerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
  5. New York City Housing Authority v. PenaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API