Legal Opinion

Adams Recreation Palace, Inc. v. Griffith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1937No. 2781PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GEIGER, J.

This cause is before this court upon appeal on questions of Jaw and iact.

The record discloses the second amended petition, the amended answer, and the reply oí the plaintiff.

There is much included in the pleadings that is not involved in the questions to be decided. However, it may conduce to clarify to briefly set out the pertinent allegations of the several pleadings.

It is alleged, m the amended petition that on April 21, 1928, the Realty Company executed to plaintiff a lease for twenty years,, commencing on August 15, 1928, and ending on August 14, 1948, for certain…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Kellogg v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Hastings v. LovejoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hager v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ayres v. BurnettOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Weinrich v. Franklin Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API