First Nat. Bank of Stephenville v. McClellan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
This is a garnishment proceeding ancillary to a suit by appellant against W. R. McClellan to recover upon a liquidated demand.
McClellan made a motion to quash the proceeding, setting up various grounds. The grounds of the motion were all properly overruled by the court, except one, which was sustained, and the proceeding quashed. The correctness of the court action in this matter is the only question presented for review. Omitting formal portions the affidavit in garnishment made by appellant’s vice president and agent reads:
“That in this suit said bank sues for a debt, and states, on oath…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Curtis v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Curtis v. Henrietta National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Trabue v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Margerum v. SopherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Equipment Co. of Texas v. Stockyards Nat. Bank of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- First Nat. Bank in George West v. Frost Nat. Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Hawkins v. Culbertson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931