Legal Opinion

Equipment Co. of Texas v. Stockyards Nat. Bank of Fort Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1926No. 341PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

On January 11, 1924, appellant, by default, recovered judgment against Ray H. McKinley, J. H. Cox, and Arthur Cóx, composing a partnership, for $295.89, and for the further sum of $37.54 against McKinley and J. H. Cox.. By agreement of all parties, the trial court, during January, 1924, set said judgment aside. The order granting the new trial was entered nunc pro tunc in July, 1924. Thereafter, on September 16, 1924, the cause was,, tried on its merits, and a judgment was rendered for the same amount in favor of appellant against the same parties. On May 9, 1924, H. R. Shedd, as president…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. Co. v. DancerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Burge v. Beaumont Carriage CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Green v. BanksTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Dickinson v. First State Bank of BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Cawthon v. First State Bank of SaladoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Margerum v. SopherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. First Nat. Bank in George West v. Frost Nat. Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Hawkins v. Culbertson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API