Bleuer v. United States
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WARING, District Judge.
This is a suit against the United States upon an alleged contract of employment. Plaintiff demanded a jury trial. Upon the call of the case, it appeared that this action was brought under authority of Title 28, U.S.C. § 1346 (2). This is what was formerly and commonly called the Tucker Act. It is well established that cases brought under the Tucker Act are triable before the Court without a jury. This matter, being brought to the attention of Plaintiff’s counsel, they acquiesced in this point of view and the cause was thereupon tried by the Court sitting alone.
The…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Leland K. Aubrey and Charlotte R. Aubrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Pulaski Cab Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Borden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Leroy D. Brummitt and Mary A. Brummitt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Swiff-Train Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.