Legal Opinion

Harman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1936No. A-8955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was adjudged guilty of a direct contempt by the district court of Pawnee county and was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 find to'serve 30 days in the county jail.

Defendant was .a witness'for- the state in State v. Kennamer in the district court, wherein defendant in that case was being tried on a charge of murder. Kennamer v. State 59 Okla. Cr. 146, 57 Pac. (2d) 646. The conduct of defendant, when called as a witness, is the basis for this contempt proceeding. When sworn as a witness, she refused to testify; further, while on the stand, when…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gompers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Kennamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Ex Parte SullivanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Ex Parte GudenogeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Ex Parte DawesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StephensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API