Legal Opinion

Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1930No. 5557PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a discharge in bankruptcy to appellants on the ground that they had failed to explain satisfactorily losses of assets and the deficiency of assets to meet their liabilities at the time of adjudication as bankrupts. Section 14b(7) Bankruptcy Act as amended by the Act of May 27, 1926 (11 USCA § 32).

This ease presents purely a question of fact. The District Court in 37 F.(2d) 403 reviewed the material facts and reached the conclusion that a discharge should be withheld. It would serve no good purpose to again review the facts. It is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Shapiro & OrnishDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1929

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. First American Bank of New York v. Bodenstein (In Re Bodenstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. Nof v. Gannon (In Re Gannon)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. First Texas Savings Ass'n v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Fox v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API