Legal Opinion

Doty v. Southern Pacific Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1942No. Civil No. 4498PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— I. E. Doty and Mary Doty, his wife, plaintiffs, brought suit against Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, defendant, for damages alleged to have been sustained by the negligence of the latter. After plaintiffs had filed their first amended complaint, defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that it did not state a cause of action, and the motion was granted, whereupon this appeal was taken.

The sole question before us is whether the amended complaint states facts showing that plaintiff Mary Doty’s injuries were caused by the negligence of defendant. Its allegations, after setting up the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Dennis v. StukeyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hart v. StenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Coe v. HoughArizona Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. TemplarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. LeRoy v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. RenfroeArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Golfinos v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API