Legal Opinion

United States v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 11, 1956No. 55 C 1480PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

This proceeding in equity was brought by the United States under the provisions of Section 4 of the Sherman AntiTrust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4, 26 Stat. 209 as amended, to enjoin alleged offenses under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, 26 Stat. 209 as amended. The suit was originally commenced in the District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, and was transferred to this court upon the defendants’ motion under the provisions of § 1404 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.

Named as defendants are two corporations and three individuals. The defendant American…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robert Schaefer and Sandra Schaefer v. First National Bank of LincolnwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Armstrong v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Mason City Tent & Awning Company v. ClapperDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1956
  4. United States v. Provident National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. May v. Baker (In Re Baker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API