Legal Opinion
Hancock v. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 28, 1994No. 93-CV-109PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:
On July 20, 1992, appellant brought suit against The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (BNA) (his former employer) for constructive discharge, alleging that he had been forced to retire due to BNA’s discriminatory conduct toward him. Appellee BNA moved for summary judgment and appellant now appeals the trial court’s grant of that motion.
The trial court concluded that the applicable one-year statute of limitations (“SOL”) for appellant’s constructive discharge action could begin to run no later than the date appellant decided to retire. Appellant submitted a memorandum…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lugo Montalvo v. Sol Meliá Vacation ClubSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2015
- Hendel v. World Plan Executive CouncilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Varner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Shelcusky v. GarjulioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.