Legal Opinion

City of Fort Scott v. Peck

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1897No. 171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Allen District Court. Hon. L. Still-well, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMilton, J.

This action was brought by C. G. Peck, as administrator of the estate of his son, D. O. Peck, deceased, under section 4518, General Statutes of 1889, against the City of Fort Scott and the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad Company, jointly, to recover damages which said plaintiff alleged he had sustained by reason of the death of his son.

At about three o’clock A. M., on November 30, 1890, D. O. Peck was driving an omnibus going east on Third Street in Fort Scott, taking a passenger from the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railroad depot. The vehicle was nine feet two inches in height. Over…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Dewald v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Cohn v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Langan v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Platt v. LarterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API