Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Haken Person

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1907No. Nos. 15,125-(45)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $1,103.12 upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Baxter, J., who, at the conclusion of the testimony, directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,163.05. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover upon a promissory note, in which plaintiff had a directed verdict, and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.

*31The facts are as follows: Defendants made and delivered to the Aultman Engine & Thresher Company, a corporation, their promissory note for $1,100 in part payment for a certain steam threshing engine, then sold and delivered to them by that company. Thereafter,, before the maturity of the note,' and for a valuable consideration, the Aultman Company, payee of the note, indorsed and delivered the same to plaintiff, and this action was brought to recover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Montreal v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Mendenhall v. UlrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Barber v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Riggs v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Bland v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
  3. First National Bank v. McNairySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Cole v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Eckerly v. LAKE REGION SIGN COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API