Legal Opinion

Dreyfuss v. Lund

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1966No. 3843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Judge.

In this action by a broker for commission on the sale of realty, defendant moved for judgment at the close of plaintiff’s case, stood on the motion and offered no testimony. The trial court made written findings of fact and conclusions of law and awarded judgment to plaintiff. The case is here on defendant’s appeal.

Plaintiff’s evidence may be summarized as follows: Having obtained a listing agreement on property owned by Wasserman, the broker in 1959 procured Bell as a tenant. Wasserman and Bell entered into a lease, to terminate on March 31, 1964. This lease was “subject to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Everett v. EverettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fry v. DoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API