Legal Opinion

Fry v. Doyle

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 31, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

151 N.J. Super. 115 (1977)

376 A.2d 585

HARRY W. FRY, T/A H.W. FRY REALTY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

WILLIAM J. DOYLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND T/A WILLIAM J. DOYLE ENTERPRISES AND ELIZABETH F. JUNG, INDIVIDUALLY, SEVERALLY, AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided May 31, 1977.

Messrs. Miller, Myers, Matteo & Rabil, attorneys for plaintiff (Mr. John L. Miller appearing).

Messrs. Hartman, Schlesinger, Schlosser & Faxon, attorneys for defendant Doyle (Mr. Jan Schlesinger appearing).

Mr. James Logan, Jr. attorney for defendant Jung (Mr. Jeffrey Clark, appearing).

WELLS,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Harris v. PerlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. State v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Sustick v. SlatinaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Brenner and Co. v. PerlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fry v. DoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. PaysonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Clark v. Mead Realty Group, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. Robert & Richard Associates v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API