Legal Opinion
Parkton Enterprises, Inc. v. Krulac
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
David A. Krulac and Diane E. Krulac, husband and wife, (Krulacs) and Cumberland County Tax Claim Bureau (Bureau) appeal from the December 1, 2003, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County (trial court) granting the petition of Parkton Enterprises, Inc. (Parkton) to set aside the Tax Upset Sale of property located at 705 Erford Road, East Penns-boro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania (Property) and quieting title in Parkton. We affirm.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. On January 31, 2001, Eastern Savings Bank FSB' (Eastern) obtained a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tracy v. County of Chester, Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Geier v. Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Krawec v. Carbon County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Michener v. Montgomery County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rice v. Compro Distributing, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. KDR INVESTMENTS, LLPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Piper v. Tax Claim Bureau of Westmoreland CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re: The Upset Sale of Properties against which delinquent 2014 Taxes were returned to the Tax Claim Unit ~ Appeal of: H. BeckerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019