Citimortgage, Inc. v. KDR INVESTMENTS, LLP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
KDR Investments, LLP (KDR), the successful bidder at an upset tax sale of property owned by Citimortgage, Inc. (Citimortgage), appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County (trial court) which set aside the sale. The trial court did so because it determined that the Dauphin County Tax Claim Bureau (Bureau) failed to give proper notice of the upset tax sale to the owner, as required by the Real Estate Tax Sale Law 1 (Tax Sale Law). Because we conclude that proper notice was not, in fact, given, we will affirm, albeit for a different reason than that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tracy v. County of Chester, Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rice v. Compro Distributing, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Sabbeth v. TAX CLAIM BUREAU OF FULTON CTY.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Geier v. Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In re the Tax Sales by the Tax Claim Bureau of Dauphin CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Appeal of McGlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Lerza-Keubler v. Monroe County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Bethel Park SD v. C. ReynoldsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Borough of Parkesburg v. J.M. RzoncaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Heisler's Egg Farm, Inc. v. Walker Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.