Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Suffolk Ob-Gyn Group, P.C.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1986No. 85 CV 1649PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs. in this diversity action seek damages arising from the defendants’ alleged medical malpractice. On May 9, 1986, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding $2,750,000 to plaintiff Cheryl Pruitt and $250,000 to her husband, Robert Pruitt. The jury found both of the defendant-physicians negligent, and determined that 80% of the total negligence causing the damage was attributable to Dr. DeAngelis and the remaining 20% was attributable to Dr. Ciaravino and the Suffolk County OB-GYN Group.
Defendants move for a new trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Victor Bevevino v. M. S. SaydjariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States of America Ex Rel. Tyrone B. Larkins v. Russell G. Oswald, Commissioner of Corrections of New York StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Wheatley v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Carl O. Akermanis, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anna Rufino, as Guardian Ad Litem of Neil Rufino, and Anna Rufino, Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Garrison v. Mollers North America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993