Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Austin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1994No. 9315SC648PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile accident. Plaintiff alleged that he was a passenger in the car driven by defendant Curtis Dale Austin (hereinafter “Curtis”). Plaintiff sought to hold Ronald and Frances Austin, the parents of Curtis, liable under the family purpose doctrine and under the theory of negligent entrustment. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant Ronald Austin and submitted the case to the jury. The jury found that Curtis negligently drove the car and that his conduct was willful or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearce v. BarhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. King v. AllredCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maglione v. Aegis Family Health CentersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Austin v. Bald II, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Sobczak v. VorholtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Blum v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. McFarland v. CromerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API