Pierre v. Providence Washington Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Goldstein, J.
At issue here is whether the MCS-90 endorsement to a policy issued by the defendant, Providence Washington Insurance Company (hereinafter Providence), to Blue Hen Lines, Inc. (hereinafter Blue Hen), a licensed interstate motor carrier, requires Providence to pay the plaintiff damages for his personal injuries pursuant to a judgment against the driver and owner of a tractor leased to Blue Hen. It is undisputed that the driver and the owner of the tractor fall within the policy definition of an “insured.”
On November 30, 1994, the plaintiff’s motor vehicle was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mostow v. State Farm Ins. Cos.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,034 Prestige Casualty Company v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- C.C.R. Realty of Dutchess, Inc. v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lynch v. YobOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Seneca Insurance v. W.S. Distribution, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- M&N Management Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Brennan Bros. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.