Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gaines & Stern Co. v. Schwarzwald, Robiner, Wolf & Rock, Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1990No. 57965Published

1DissentMatia, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent on two grounds. First, the law of this state indicates that if grounds for relief from judgment are apparent, the court is obligated to hold an evidentiary hearing prior to overruling a motion requesting such relief. U.A.P. Columbus JV326132 v. Plum (1986), 27 Ohio App.3d 293, 27 OBR 338, 500 N.E.2d 924. Also, Neubauer v. Kender (1986), 32 Ohio App.3d 49, 513 N.E.2d 1359. Since the court below did not hold a hearing, yet overruled the motion, the court abused its discretion. The majority opinion from the appellate court equates the appellants’ failure to exhaust all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. U.A.P. Columbus Jv326132 v. PlumOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Neubauer v. KenderOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API