Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peirce

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1904No. 4,627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (10,537) II. O. Allen, Judge. Action by Elizabeth Peirce as administratrix of the estate of Ferdinand N. Armstrong, deceased, against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment rendered on a verdict for $2,250, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for causing the death of the decedent, alleging that it resulted from appellant’s negligence. Her complaint was in one paragraph, to which a demurrer was overruled. Appellant’s motion to make the complaint more specific was also overruled. Appellant answered in two paragraphs, to the second of which appellee replied in three paragraphs, to the second and third paragraphs of which a demurrer was overruled. Trial by jury, verdict and judgment for appellee. The jury also found specially by its answers to interrogatories addressed to it. Appellant’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pence v. AugheIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Farris v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Frazer v. State ex rel. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Jenkins v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Jourdan v. Town of LagrangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API