Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Duffy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 23, 1994No. Civ. No. 77-2019 (CRR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 530
DISCUSSION............................................................... 531
I. THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PETITIONERS ARE ENTITLED TO INTERVENTION OF RIGHT UNDER RULE 24(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.................................... 531
A. TIMELINESS..................................................... 531
B. INTEREST AND PRACTICAL IMPAIRMENT..................... 533
C. ADEQUACY OF REPRESENTATION.............................. 534
D. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES................ 535
II…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carolee Brady Hartman v. Joseph Duffey, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Campbell v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Wallach v. Eaton Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Garcia Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration and Custom EnforcementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.