Ruddock v. Bloedel Donovan Lumber Mills
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The laws of the state of Washington provide that any owner of land which is so situated with respect to the land of another that it is necessary for its proper use and enjoyment to have and maintain a private way of necessity, or to construct and maintain any drain, flume, or ditch, on, aeross, over, or through the land of such other, for agricultural, domestic, or sanitary purposes, may condemn and take lands of such other sufficient in area for the construction and maintenance of such drain, flume, or ditch, as the ease may be, and that the term “private way of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Bucher v. Cheshire RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marinclin v. UrlingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Oregon Mesabi Corp. v. C. D. Johnson Lumber Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- McCarthy v. Bloedel Donovan Lumber MillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930