Legal Opinion

Raia v. Raia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1926No. 6 Div. 430PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill is to annul a marriage of an infant which was procured by fraud. The facts averred show that the marriage was procured by and through the fraud perpetrated by appellant' upon appellee, and brought the case within the doctrine enunciated by the courts to the effect that a marriage procured by fraud of such character as to go to the essence of the marriage and affect the free conduct of the injured party may be annulled, provided application for annulment be made before the consummation of the marriage by voluntary cohabitation. Brown v. Scott, 117 A. 114, 140 Md. 258, 22 A. L. R. 810;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Barrington v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Fisk v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Hyslop v. HyslopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Knight v. KnightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Wemple v. WempleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API