Legal Opinion

Ehrlich v. Alper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although the complaint in this action cannot be sustained, plaintiff, under a proper complaint, may establish a cause of action. It is well-settled law that if the defendant corporate officers, for the sole purpose of obtaining a pecuniary benefit for themselves or any of them and not for the benefit of the corporation, induced a breach of the corporation’s existing contract with the plaintiff, the defendants can be held liable for damages sustained regardless of whether the pecuniary benefit actually materialized (Buckley v. 112 Central Park South, 285 App. Div. 331). The amended complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buckley v. 112 Central Park South, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wampler v. PalmertonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Joan Hansen & Co. v. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Hoag v. Chancellor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. The Savage is Loose Co. v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Retropolis, Inc. v. 14th Street Development LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API