Legal Opinion

Buckley v. 112 Central Park South, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1954PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.

The individual defendant, Jerome Minskoff, appeals from an order denying a motion under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the second cause of action in the amended complaint. In the first cause of action the plaintiff seeks to recover from the corporate defendant, 112 Central Park South, Inc., for commissions due for services rendered as a broker in effecting the sale of realty owned by the corporation.

The second cause of action, in substance, alleges that the plaintiff was employed by the corporate defendant acting through its representative, the appellant, to find a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Navarro v. FioritaNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Vassardakis v. ParishDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. Lynch v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Lynch v. Gibson, FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Samuel Albert v. Salmen Loksen, Brooklyn Hospital and Karen BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Murtha v. Yonkers Child Care Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  5. Stillman v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API