Legal Opinion

Haygood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 2011No. 2D09-4769PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Jeremy Haygood appeals his judgment of conviction for second-degree murder and his resulting sentence of life imprisonment. Relying in part on State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), he submits that the trial court committed fundamental error by delivering the then-standard jury instruction on manslaughter by act. Although Mr. Haygood’s argument is arguably supported by supreme court precedent, we adhere to the precedent of this district as established in Barros-Dias v. State, 41 So.3d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), and Nieves v. State, 22 So.3d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), and we accordingly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Pena v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Haygood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Daugherty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Dawkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Thomas Daugherty v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  5. Curry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API