Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 2009No. 1D07-4688PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION AND REHEARING EN BANC

LEWIS, J.

We deny the State’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We grant the State’s motion for clarification, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following therefor.

Steven Montgomery, Appellant, appeals his judgment and sentence for second-degree murder. He contends the trial court fundamentally erred in giving the standard jury instruction for manslaughter by act, as it erroneously suggests that intent to kill is an element of that crime. We agree with Appellant because the standard instruction imposed an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Carpenter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Lincecum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. In Re Standard Instruct. in Cr. Cases No. 2007-10Supreme Court of Florida · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Richard O. Rambaran v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. In re Amendments To Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Instruction 7.7.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. United States v. Juan Garcia-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API