Legal Opinion

People v. Pigage

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 2003No. G029933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

A jury convicted defendant Stephen Walter Pigage of possession of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine (count one) and possession of methamphetamine as a lesser included offense to possession of methamphetamine for sale (count two). The jury also found true allegations defendant served a prior prison term.

Defendant challenges the court’s denial of his Marsden 1 motion and two motions to continue trial for the purposes of (1) further investigation, and (2) to obtain new counsel, and the court’s proceeding with the trial in his absence. He…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pope v. BabickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Osborne v. Todd Farm ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. P. v. Villalpando CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. Baker CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Davis CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API