Legal Opinion

Ogbonna-McGruder v. Austin Peay State University

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 30, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00506Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE CHINYERE OGBONNA-McGRUDER ) ) Case No. 3:21-cv-00506 v. ) Judge Richardson ) Magistrate Judge Holmes AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s [renewed] motion to amend complaint. (Docket No. 48.)1 Defendants filed a response in opposition (Docket No. 50) and Plaintiff replied (Docket No. 51). For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Docket No. 48) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to separately file the amended complaint and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Riverview Health Institute LLC v. Medical Mutual of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Paul Moore v. City of Paducah Mayor John Penrod Joe Viterisi, Harold Ford, Robert Coleman, and Joe Flynn, Commissioners Robert E. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API