Legal Opinion

Taruc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 25, 1991No. 1-89-3518PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Plaintiff, Napoleon Taruc, brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that State Farm is responsible for providing more than the face amount of uninsured motorist coverage on Taruc’s insurance policies. The basis for this contention is State Farm’s alleged failure to offer increased coverage options as required by section 143a — 2 of the Illinois Insurance Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 73, par. 755a — 2). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of State Farm. Taruc appeals, contending that State Farm failed to make a meaningful offer of uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wasleff v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Webb v. AngellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Bradfield v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hajian v. Holy Family HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. F.H. Paschen/S.N. Nielsen, Inc. v. Burnham Station, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Torgerson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Reedy Industries, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Torgerson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API