Legal Opinion
People v. Chen
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1974No. Crim. 11515PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Appellant contends that he was denied the right to have counsel present during interrogation, that the provisions of section 851.5 of the Penal Code should have applied during the custodial interrogation, and that the evidence was insufficient to establish the voluntariness of his confession.
The record indicates no attempt on the part of appellant to secure a certificate of probable cause from the trial court. Under the circumstances, the issues raised are not properly before us and the appeal must be dismissed. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5.) However, the record also shows that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DerricoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. HaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.