State v. Tucker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Justice.
Defendants were convicted of the first-degree murder of Brenda Cecil. Their cases were consolidated for trial over the objections of both defendants. The joinder raised perceived Bruton problems because defendant Tucker had made several inconsistent, pretrial statements. After lengthy debate, the State acknowledged that it could not properly “sanitize” certain statements by defendant Tucker and announced that it would not offer them. The State also chose not to offer other statements of defendant Tucker that undermined its theory of the case. Defendant Wray was not able to…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. KiserTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.