Legal Opinion

United States v. Pettus

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee

Decided November 27, 1897No. 2,052PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Henry E. Pettus was indicted for perjury committed in an election contest, and demurs to tlie indictment.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The suggestion of the district attorney that the vice of tlie argument in favor of this demurrer is in treating this indictment as if it were one charging frauds committed at the election, whereas it is only an indictment for perjury committed in giving testimony in a contested election ease, is quite true, as to several of the grounds of demurrer, and much of the argument. But it is not *792true as to all of them. It applies to the third, .fourth, seventh, and eleventh grounds of the demurrer, and they are therefore overruled.

The corner stone of this indictment is the pendency of an election…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HenbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Ulmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. United States v. HowardDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1904
  4. United States v. LautDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API