Legal Opinion
Warren v. Bromley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 16, 1923No. 3956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
A jury was waived in this case by written stipulation of the parties. The court 'below found generally for the plaintiff, and there was no request to find the facts specially, or to find generally for the defendant. In this state of the record there is manifestly no question before us for review. As stated tersely in National Surety Co. v. United States, 200 Fed. 142, 118 C. C. A. 360:
“The assignments of error complain of nothing except the finding of the court. There was no request made to the court by counsel for the surety company to find the fact specially, nor was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunsmuir v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- National Surety Co. v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Societe Nouvelle D'armement v. BarnabyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- National Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Hendrie & Bolthoff Mfg. & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- China Press, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Edwards v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925