Societe Nouvelle D'armement v. Barnaby
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern •Division of the Western District of Washington; Edward E. Cush-man, Judge. Action by J. R. Barnaby against the Societe Nouvelle d’Armement. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOLVERTON, District Judge.
It is stated by the complaint herein that:
“During said three years last past (the defendant) has maintained and is now maintaining a general agent at Seattle, Wash., for the more convenient transaction of its business in said state.”
Par. 3. “That between the 29th day of October, 1910, and the 6th day of June, 1912, in the state of Washington and the Province of British Columbia, in the Dominion of Canada, plaintiff rendered services as a ship’s agent to the defendant, at its special instance and request, in writing.”
Par. 4. “That the reasonable value and worth of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cooper v. OmohundroSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- George A. Fuller Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Jensma v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Edwards v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Sacks v. SteckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.