Acosta v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Chief Judge.
{1} Kathryn Acosta (Pedestrian) appeals the trial court’s decision to dismiss her “trip and fall” tort claims against Wirtco, Inc. (the Store). Pedestrian sued the Store and the City of Santa Fe for damages after she tripped and broke her elbow on a public sidewalk abutting the Store’s property. Pedestrian’s complaint against the City is typical — she requested damages from the City because it owns the sidewalk upon which she tripped. However, Pedestrian’s complaint against the Store raises an issue of first impression because she alleges, among other things, that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Archibeque v. HomrichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Davis v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Barela v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Heath Ex Rel. Holdyn H. v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Sunland Park v. MacIasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- McDevitt v. Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
- New Mexicans for Free Enterprise v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.