Legal Opinion

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Thum

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 18, 1901No. 10PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a final decree of the circuit court, Eastern district of New York, dismissing the bill. The suit is for infringement of United States letters patent No. 599,447, granted Eebruary 22, 1898, to complainant, as assignee of Emil Reisky, for “improvement in bowling apparatus.”

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The improvement of the patent relates. to that part of a bowling alley known, as the ball returnway or runway, which returns the balls from the pit end of the alley to the players’ end. Tbe old style of runway consisted of a track or trough which inclined downwardly all the way from the pit end to the players’ end, down which the balls rolled with a speed increasing all the¡ way, and dependent upon the degree of inclination given to the track. There were objections to this old style of way, which will be referred to in more detail further on. Briefly stated, most of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schenck v. Singer Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miehle Printing Press & Mfg. Co. v. Whitlock Printing Press & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  2. Line Material Co. v. Brady Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. George Frost Co. v. CohnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901
  4. Doig v. Morgan Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. American Graphophone Co. v. Universal Talking Mach. Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API