Hope v. Hedgerose Heights Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. April 19, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
1. Under the ruling by the Supreme Court in this ease, a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, Eulton section, has authoi'ity to direct a verdict demanded by the pleadings and the evidence in the case. Hope v. Hedgerose Heights Co., 146 Ga. 73 (90 S. E. 530).
2. No question as to the admissibility of evidence is presented by grounds in the motion for a new trial which fail to set out literally or in substance the evidence to which they relate, or which fail to give the expected answers to questions which the court refused to allow, or to state what grounds of objection to testimony admitted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Odum v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Roddenberry Hardware Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Cooner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Hollifield v. Spencer & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pelham Phosphate Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Traders Securities Co. v. Canton Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928