Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1912No. 2318PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. O. W. Morse, Judge. Action by Leonora A. Hartley against Salt Lake City. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStratjp, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the city. The charged negligence is that a crosswalk was suffered *122and permitted to'be and remain ‘in a rough, uneven, broken, and steep condition, that when ice and snow fell or formed on the same it became dangerous and unsafe for travel,” and that “ice and snow had fallen and formed on the walk and that the city suffered' and permitted it to remain,” by reason of which the plaintiff while walking along the walk was injured. The plaintiff had judgment, from which the defendant…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Morgan v. Bingham Stage Lines Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Webb v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Parry v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Pratt v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API