Legal Opinion
United States v. Stuart Alan Wilbur
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1970No. 24704_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
Wilbur was found guilty by a jury of refusal to submit to induction in the armed forces, 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. He appeals from his conviction raising a number of alleged errors committed by the selective service system and the trial court. Three contentions merit written consideration:(1) Wilbur was improperly denied a mandatory educational deferment;(2) Wilbur’s local board failed to forward a statement of Wilbur’s emotional condition for consideration by the Armed Forces examining center;(3) The local board refused to grant a requested personal appearance.
Consi…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trw, Inc., and Horace A. Shepard v. The Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. AullDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Gerald Robert Sheridan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Robert Edwin AullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Barrus Construction Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.